Available 24/7 for urgent matters & bail applications
● Free Initial Consultation Call 0470 270 415
Destroying or Damaging Property by Fire in NSW

Destroying or Damaging Property by Fire in NSW: Penalties and What the Prosecution Must Prove

September 22, 2026

Fire-related property damage charges are treated far more seriously than ordinary property damage under NSW law. If you or someone you know is facing this kind of charge, understanding the legal framework is the first step.

The Governing Law

Arson in NSW is governed by the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) and the Rural Fires Act 1997 (NSW), covering intentional or reckless damage to property by fire, with penalties reaching as high as 25 years’ imprisonment where life is endangered. There isn’t a single “arson” offence — instead, several sections of the Crimes Act apply depending on intent and circumstances.

Section 195: Destroying or Damaging Property

This is the core offence. Section 195 of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) makes it an offence to intentionally or recklessly destroy or damage property belonging to another person, covering conduct ranging from vandalism and graffiti to deliberate destruction.

Elements the prosecution must prove (beyond reasonable doubt):

  1. The accused destroyed or damaged property;
  2. The property belonged to another person;
  3. The destruction or damage was caused intentionally or recklessly. A person is considered reckless if they realised their conduct may possibly destroy or damage the property but proceeded anyway.

 

Maximum penalties:

  • Base offence: 5 years’ imprisonment
  • Where the damage is caused by fire or explosives: 10 years’ imprisonment
  • Where committed in company with another person, using fire or explosives: 11 years’ imprisonment
  • Aggravated circumstances (fire/explosives, in company): up to 12 years’ imprisonment

Section 196: Destroying or Damaging Property to Cause Injury

Section 196 covers destroying or damaging property with the intention of causing injury to another person. The maximum penalty is 14 years’ imprisonment where fire is used, rising to 16 years if committed during a public disorder such as a riot.

Section 197: Dishonestly Destroying or Damaging Property

This section targets financially motivated fire-setting — the classic “insurance job.” A person commits this offence if they dishonestly destroy or damage property by means of fire, for financial gain, carrying a maximum penalty of 14 years’ imprisonment, or 16 years if committed during a public disorder.

Section 198: Intent to Endanger Life

The most serious of the group. Where property is destroyed or damaged with intent to endanger another person’s life, the maximum penalty is 25 years’ imprisonment.

Bushfire-Related Offences

Given NSW’s bushfire risk, separate provisions apply to reckless fire-lighting near vegetation. Section 203E makes it an offence to set a fire and be reckless as to its spread to vegetation on public land or land belonging to another. Under the Rural Fires Act 1997 (NSW), deliberately lighting fires without lawful authority carries a maximum penalty of five years’ imprisonment and/or an $11,000 fine, while bushfire-related offences under the Crimes Act can attract up to 25 years’ imprisonment given the potentially catastrophic consequences.

Local Court vs District Court

Matters may be dealt with summarily in the Local Court, where penalties are capped lower, or on indictment in the District Court, where the full statutory maximum penalties apply. Whether a matter stays in the Local Court often depends on the value of the damage and the specific charge laid — an important early strategic consideration for the defence.

Why Legal Representation Matters

Because “recklessness” is central to several of these offences, cases often turn on what the accused foresaw or intended at the time — not just on the fact that a fire occurred. An experienced criminal defence lawyer can assess whether the prosecution can actually prove each element, challenge the characterisation of intent or recklessness, and identify whether the matter should be argued summarily rather than on indictment.

This article provides general information only and is not legal advice. If you’re facing a charge under sections 195–198 of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), contact Harvard Defence Lawyers for advice specific to your situation.